Skip to content

postmedieval 5.3: The Holocaust and the Middle Ages

Special Issue Edited by Hannah Johnson and Nina CaputoOC.indd

ISSUE EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION

The Middle Ages and the Holocaust: Medieval Anti-Judaism in the Crucible of Modern Thought
Hannah Johnson and Nina Caputo

ARTICLES

Exegetical History: Nazis at the Round Table
Martin Shichtman and Laurie A. Finke

‘Modern and Genuine Mediaevalism’: Guido Kisch’s Romance with the German Middle Ages
Mitchell B. Hart

Defending the West: Cultural Racism and Pan-Europeanism on the Far-Right
Daniel Wollenberg

Jean-Claude Milner: Remarks on the Name Jew and the Universal
Translated by Robert S. Kawashima

‘The history of an incorrect term’: Agamben, Etymology and the Medieval History of the Holocaust
Heather Blurton

One or Several Jews? The Jewish Massed Body in Old Norse Literature
Richard Cole

RESPONSE ESSAY

Ethics and the Voices of the Past
Fred Evans

BOOK REVIEW ESSAY

Unstable as Water
Ruth Nisse

[see postmedieval site at Palgrave for more information on this and other issues]

ANNOUNCING: Burn After Reading from punctum books

Burn After ReadingBAR_Cover_Front_WEB

Vol. 1 // Miniature Manifestos for a Post/medieval Studies

edited by Eileen A. Joy and Myra Seaman

Vol. 2 // The Future We Want: A Collaboration

edited by Jeffrey Jerome Cohen

Brooklyn, NY: punctum books / Washington, DC: Oliphaunt Books, 2014. 226 pages, illus. ISBN-13: 978-0692204412. OPEN-ACCESS e-book and $15.00 [€12.00/£11.00] in print: paperbound/5 X 8 in.

Published: 2014-04-28

Download book


. . . better to take the risk and engage in fidelity to a Truth-event, even if it ends in catastrophe, than to vegetate in the eventless utilitarian-hedonist survival of what Nietzsche called the ‘last men.’

~ Slavoj Žižek, Living in the End Times 

The essays, manifestos, rants, screeds, pleas, soliloquies, telegrams, broadsides, eulogies, songs, harangues, confessions, laments, and acts of poetic terrorism in these two volumes — which collectively form an academic “rave” — were culled, with some later additions, from roundtable sessions at the International Congress on Medieval Studies in 2012 and 2013, organized bypostmedieval: a journal for medieval cultural studies and the BABEL Working Group (“Burn After Reading: Miniature Manifestos for a Post/medieval Studies,” “Fuck This: On Letting Go,” and “Fuck Me: On Never Letting Go”) and George Washington University’s Medieval and Early Modern Studies Institute (“The Future We Want: A Collaboration”), respectively. Gathering together a rowdy multiplicity of voices from within medieval and early modern studies, these two volumes seek to extend and intensify a conversation about how to shape premodern studies, and also the humanities, in the years ahead. Authors in both volumes, in various ways, lay claim to the act(s) of manifesting, and also anti-manifesting, as a collective endeavor that works on behalf of the future without laying any belligerent claims upon it, where we might craft new spaces for the University-at-large, which is also a University that wanders, that is never just somewhere, dwelling in the partitive — of a particular place — but rather, seeks to be everywhere, always on the move, pandemic, uncontainable, and always to-come, while also being present/between us (manifest). This is not a book, but a blueprint. It is also an ephemeral gathering in the present tense.

TABLE OF CONTENTS Read more

This is Not My (or, Our) Time, so Please Take Ecstasy With Me: The Necessity of Generous Reading

by EILEEN JOY

for Jeffrey Cohen, Michael O’Rourke, and Karl Steel, scholars-in-armsand also for Carolyn Dinshaw

As we navigate the ruins of [Bill] Readings’ university without condition and transgress the cross-hatches of disciplinary boundaries, we answer to a duty — as Derrida reminds us, a responsibility to listen to others while subjecting ourselves to encounters with otherness. This is ongoing work however, because, as [Claude] Romano explains, “an encounter is not so much a ‘presentation’ (of two people) as afuturition. It has meaning only through the possibilities that it holds in reserve, which give it its future-loading.” These encounters are beginnings that never end because they “constantly defer” themselves by “opening ceaseless new possibilities.” Ruin is, as Jeffrey Cohen [has] brought home to us so beautifully [in his recent work] . . . “a going-from,” but as we go, we should be willing to take no end of risks. 

~Michael O’Rourke, Response to “Parts, Wholes, and the New,” conference panel organized by theOrganism for Poetic Research, 2nd Biennial Meeting of the BABEL Working Group, Boston 2012
The intimacy with an unknown body is the revelation of . . . distance at the very moment we appear to be crossing an uncrossable interval. Otherness, unlocatable within differences that can be known and enumerated, is made concrete in the eroticized touching of a body without attributes. A non-masochistic jouissance (one that owes nothing to the death drive) is the sign of the nameless, identity-free contact with an object I do not know and certainly do not love and which has, unknowingly, agreed to be momentarily the incarnated shock of otherness. In that moment we relate to that which transcends all relations.
~Leo Bersani, “Sociability and Cruising”

For a long time now, I have been thinking about what I am going to call — for lack of a better phrase at present — generous reading. It’s this (utopic) (foolish) idea I have that, within the humanities and the university more broadly, we might actually devise a way to read the work of others — even those we might disagree with for all sorts of reasons, or from whom we might feel disciplinarily (and otherwise) estranged — with some sort of spirit of radical openness to what others are desiring to think and articulate at any given moment. I say quite purposefully – desiring to think and articulate – because I believe we put too little of a premium within our professional academic lives on actually caring about other persons’ intellectual wishes and desires (what does he, she, they, want? what are they TRYING to say/do? what do they need from me?), and instead often approach others’ work primarily from the route of how we think we might be able to utilize the “end products” of that work (positively or negatively) in our own scholarship, which scholarship (moreover) is often conceptualized along fairly narrow theoretical, methodological, temporal, disciplinary and other lines (for the important sake of “expertise,” this is sometimes, and valuably, necessary). Let me clarify before proceeding so that it does not seem as if I am claiming that most of us supposedly work within overly “narrow” intellectual and other concerns and interests. I do not believe that and would like to further believe that most of us are on the lookout most of the time for new ideas, and new provocations to thought; it’s just that, given the constraints of our lives (teaching schedules, personal lives, disciplinary boundaries that are not always easy to cross, and various other stresses and pressures), the amount of time we have to simply read other scholars’ work simply for the purpose of answering the (hopefully) joyous question — “I wonder what THIS is about?” — feels (or maybe really is) unavailable. Read more

ANNOUNCING: Staying Alive from punctum books

Staying Alive_Cover_Front_WebStaying Alive: A Survival Manual for the Liberal Arts

by L.O. Aranye Fradenburg

Edited by Eileen A. Joy

Brooklyn, NY: punctum books, 2013. 372 pages, illus. ISBN-13: 978-0615906508. OPEN-ACCESS e-book and $17.00 [€15.00/£14.00] in print: paperbound/5 X 8 in.

Published: 2013-10-21

Download book


There are many different kinds of intelligence, and there will always be a few writers who don’t need to read Shakespeare in college, or game designers who don’t need economics courses to get rich. But a terrible narrowing of the mind and of mental experience is ongoing in our country, sometimes waved on by the very scientists who ought most of all to respect the mind’s powers. The philosopher Guillaume LeBlanc argues that philosophy should now understand itself as work performed on behalf of particular cultures and ecologies, producing a new ethos of the philosopher for whom the question of belonging to an ordinary world has become, not something to bracket or transcend, but centrally important. Understanding how ordinariness is produced, and critiquing self-evidence, remain crucial activities of cultural analysis, as does the defense of expertise; but it is not simply a matter of intellectuals going public. It is also a matter of experts deciphering the relationship of their work to the arts of thriving and surviving, and feeding the results of their analyses back into their work. And it is time to fight, not just for this or that way of thinking, but for the experience of mind itself, and its cultivation — for (the pleasures of) knowing, reasoning, investigating, analyzing, debating, loving, desiring, and reflecting.

~ L.O. Aranye Fradenburg, “Living the Liberal Arts,” Staying Alive

Staying Alive: A Survival Manual for the Liberal Arts fiercely defends the liberal arts in and from an age of neoliberal capital and techno-corporatization run amok, arguing that the public university’s purpose is not vocational training, but rather the cultivation of what Fradenburg calls “artfulness,” including the art of making knowledge. In addition to sustained critical and creative thinking, the humanities develop the mind’s capacities for real-time improvisational communication and interpretation, without which we can neither thrive nor survive. Humanist pedagogy and research use play, experimentation and intersubjective exchange to foster forms of artfulness critical to the future of our species. From perception to reality-testing to concept-formation and logic, the arts and humanities teach us to see, hear and respond more keenly, and to imagine, or “model,” new futures and possibilities. Innovation of all kinds, technological or artistic, depends on the enhancement of the skills proper to staying alive. Read more

ANNOUNCING punctum records: a sound-impress of punctum books

Shivery Shakes_PBR_1

We are thrilled to announce  the launching of punctum records: a sound-impress of punctum books, with an initial 7″-single release by Austin, Texas band Shivery Shakes — “Sidewalk Talk” — later this summer. punctum records aims to build a label that will house a rowdy assemblage of muscians, sound/noise artists, acoustic technologists, musicologists, and sound theorists. Although we are still somewhat “under construction,” we share with you below our vision statement and Advisory Board, and you can also check out the label’s website HERE, plus follow us on FacebookTwitter(@punctumrecords), Soundcloud, and Tumblr.

punctum records: vision statement

Learning to listen is the intentional task of solidarity; listening in tension.

~ Ultra-red

What happens when you begin to realize another world is possible — that’s art.

~ DJ Spooky

punctum records: a sound-impress of punctum books, is an open-access & vinyl publisher of music and other sonic forms that take creative, slantwise-flying leaps, tarry in the archive of sensible forms, build pleasurably noisy pandemoniums, and seek to make sound an interventionist medium of both disruption and connection. Discography as fever dream, house party, rhythmic riot. Sound as connective tissue, tactical media, ambient rain.

punctum records is an experiment in bringing together cultural theorists, musciologists, sound artists, and musicians as lovers and fighters in the ruins of the arts and humanities at a moment when information-noise overload meets a flattening out of channels and platforms for the sustainable dissemination of music, sonic art, and theory. punctum records is placing a wager on the label, or publishing house, as an important domain for a collective-activist experiment in the construction of what Ivan Illich called “tools for conviviality,” and for developing sound-styles that would “give priority to the protection, the maximum use, and the enjoyment of … personal energy under personal control.”[1] In affinity with punctum books’s commitment to fostering para-academic shelters for the cultivation of open, vagabond publics, punctum records is bent on “pressing” an unruly crowd of sounds into the ventilating system called the cultural commons, and on playing the shadow-demon-parasite-prod-supplement to the so-called “music industry.” Sound label as field of play, wandering group house, rogue frequency.

punctum records invites theorists, musicians, and sound artists (or any combination thereof) to propose singles, mixtapes, EPs, LPs, audiocasts, soundscapes, operas, discographies, acoustical memes, noise art, sound waves, librettos, samplers, wave emissions, soundscapes, audio channels, sonic fictions, field recordings, fugues, listening devices, radio broadcasts, digital sound exhibits, sonic archaeologies, audio-loops, acoustic manuals, ambient backgrounds, echo chambers, musical algorithms, choral reefs, mashups, soundtracks, live recordings, sound/spoken word poetry, sound-walls, earworms, interstellar messages, improvisational sessions, digital concerts, transcriptions, busking performances, and sonic-theory compositions of any kind. Read more

Recent Articles

8
Nov

BABEL Steering Committee Election open! (8 Nov-14 Nov)

SC vote buttonWe’re having our first election! All BABELers are invited–urged!–to select the first BABEL  Steering Committee.

This group of 12 will guide BABEL into its gorgeous future, distributing the load Eileen and Myra have carried in the group’s early years. At least 3 members of the Steering Committee will be current grad students, non-tenure track faculty, and non-academics, with each position having a term of 2-3 years.

The slate of nominated candidates includes 42 (forty-two!) people who are generously offering their services to BABEL. Please read their statements here, and then go here to vote for 12 of the 42. (If only a 42-person steering committee could be functional!)

Voting will remain open until midnight (EST) on Friday, November 14. The members of the BABEL Steering Committee will be announced on Saturday, November 15.

Thanks to all who take the time to get informed about the candidates and to vote–and thanks to all who have offered to serve!

8
Nov

BABEL Steering Committee Candidates

Slate of Candidates for BABEL Steering Committee election: Nov 8-14

To vote, click here.

Suzanne Conklin Akbari (Tenure-Track Faculty, English and Medieval Studies, University of Toronto)

BABEL is a capacious tent, where different languages, methods, technologies, and arts come together. I’ve always tried to be a person who brings people together, making linkages that might be counterintuitive but turn out to be amazingly fruitful. As a member of the BABEL Steering Committee, I would work to create juxtapositions, combinations, and communities that generate the unexpected.

Cynthia Bateman (Grad Student, English, University of South Carolina)

I offer BABEL my commitment to interdisciplinary scholarship. My past and current research brings together insights from gender studies, animal studies, literary studies, science studies, the medical humanities, rhetorical studies, and the history of science. I also offer BABEL my willingness to go to the extra mile (evidenced by my starting a new journal–Itineration–at the same time as my starting a doctoral program), and my desire to create and participate in a scholarly space that devotes itself to imagining the world otherwise (evidenced by my starting the Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies Graduate Association at USC).

Roland Betancourt (Tenure-Track Faculty, Art History, University of California, Irvine)

As part of the steering committee, I wish to prioritize BABEL expanding its group of constituents, particularly aiming to bring into its folds scholars, activists, artists, and other para-academics working specifically on art history, theology, and popular culture, which have been thus far underrepresented. My wish is to see BABEL be more actively inclusive of people working on issues, such as Latin American liberation theology, that harness the heritage of the medieval for contemporary emancipation in non-English speaking contexts. It is likewise necessary to incorporate medieval fields outside of Western Europe, such as Byzantium, the Islamic world, and beyond. In summation, my goal is to de-center BABEL from its literature focus, and allow it to permeate, be visible, and viable in cognate medieval/modern fields.

Liza Blake (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, University of Toronto)

There are two things that I think make BABEL an important and exciting collectivity: 1) its non-hierarchical structure and openness to new members, ways of thinking, ideas, and opportunities; and 2) the way that it creates “safe” spaces (conference panel spaces, publishing spaces) for doing creative, exciting, out-of-the-box or right-on-the-edge-of-the-box research and writing. If I were on the steering committee I’d try to keep my activities focused on enacting those two particular forks of the BABEL ethos: making sure people interested in learning more about BABEL or just meeting BABELers can find a way in to what can sometimes look like a closed crowd from the outside (through dinners, parties, arranged meetings, guerrilla-hangouts, etc.), and collaborating with others to make as many and as open spaces as possible for weird thinking.

Jen Boyle (Tenure-Track Faculty, English and New Media, Coastal Carolina University)

I came to BABEL in 2007 (I think), and the experience has been transformative. So transformative, that I feel its biggest challenges (for me) are still unmet in many ways. What precisely do we mean by “para-academic” at the moment, a moment that somehow simultaneously manages to exploit those in precarious relationship to the academic institution, and to place in jeopardy the very profession of the academic (“declaring publicly” with some meaning or recognition). I also would really like to explore in the context of the media/mediation/digital frenzy the idea of the para, something so close to something that it becomes its almost-contrary. I also think that we don’t cook enough together. At conferences or otherwise. We eat. We party. We don’t cook [Martha’s Vineyard an exception; for a few].

Sakina Bryant (Non-Tenure Track Faculty, English & Philosophy, Sonoma State University)

As a non-tenure track faculty member who hazards the Humanities, and as someone who has been involved with BABEL since the first conference, I want to bring to the BABEL Steering Committee a generative diplopia — one that sees BABEL as a necessary disaster while also seeing BABEL as a structured organization, reflexive to the necessary disasters that it creates and that also surround it. BABEL is fundamentally “cute,” to crib from the presentation of the term woven throughout BABEL 2014, and this fundamental “cuteness” discloses this desiring-machine’s facility for generating both desire as well as potentially destructive entanglement. Thus, BABEL needs people who have navigated the terrain of “cute” — those who are contingent, young, queer, monstrous, academically germinal, small — in an academe that fetishizes, damages, wants at, hungers for, colonizes, arborealizes, and longs to damn BABEL with foreclosure to eternal academic adulthood; and so the BABEL Steering Committee (to help BABEL as a whole) needs to be able to organize through strategic multi-vision and with an unrepentant love for us/you/myself/and even them too.

M.W. Bychowski (Grad Student, English, George Washington University)

As a young transgender scholar whose work bridges pre-modern and post-modern communities, I speak from personal intersections beyond the binaries of man/woman, gay/straight, able-bodied/disabled, academic/independent, living the question: who are we not reaching? I also have professional experience consulting with companies to create environments, digital interfaces, and event programming that speak to the needs of a wider population. In particular, I would seek out projects that expand accessibility, build community, and bolster advocacy in order to continue Babel’s legacy of making its burgeoning diversity into its new strengths.

Jason Canniff (Non-Tenure Track Faculty, English, Poetry and Poetics, University of Maine)

I am a post-MA, pre-something, queer poet/adjunct/critic/electronica DJ interested in catalyzing intellectual/creative communities whose assembled disposition(s) are somehow other than or at least complicate the unsettling trend of — as one of my adjunct comrades coined — the “corporatization of higher education.” I see BABEL as a prescient group of thinkers who have discerned, like some just prior to the real estate crash last decade, a “bubble” in this old machine, that Ponzi scheme so long in the making that most are blind to the portents. A coal miner who has now just noticed his black lung, I see myself steering BABEL to help steer those lost in academic machines to other possibilities — “lines of flight.”

Jeffrey Cohen (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, George Washington University)

I would bring to the steering committee a commitment to enabling more engagement from the membership in the governing and decision making of the group, hoping to develop the structures and forums through which BABEL can realize its long held vision of being moved by a fully participatory democracy. I am also deeply committed to BABEL’s origin in and ongoing concern for those who are excluded from secure place and serious voice in the academy.

Lowell Duckert (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, West Virginia University)

I volunteered to be a member of the Santa Barbara planning committee because I value BABEL’s commitment to forging creative collaborations. As a member of the steering committee, I will continue to stress the group’s openness, conviviality, and experimentation – but I will also work to ensure that pressing topics like academic precariousness are included within our oikos, so that all may be embraced by our ethos of radical love.

Holly Dugan (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, George Washington University)

I define scholarly community in the broadest of terms and I value it tremendously in all of its forms, both inside and outside of the academy; for that reason I have been drawn to Babel since its earliest iterations. If elected, I’d be honored to serve on its steering committee. My strengths (both in my scholarship and in my service to the profession) are in thinking about structures, both overt ones but also ones that operate in implicit, inherent, or axiomatic ways. I use this knowledge to advocate for change and a more just living and working environment in my own communities and I hope to do the same for BABEL.

Irina Dumitrescu (Tenure-Track Faculty, English/Medieval Studies, University of Bonn)

Over the past years BABEL has offered me wonderful opportunities to write, speak, and think with a community of open-minded scholars. One thing I can offer BABEL is an international perspective as it goes global: I have lived in Romania, Israel, Canada, the USA, and Germany, and my academic career spans institutions in the last three of these countries. Because I love the opportunities Babel creates, I want to offer it criticism too, to work towards making it more inclusive, more open to all kinds of scholars (including ye olde philologists), and when it makes sense, deeper and more rigorous. Finally, I can offer the dark sense of humour that is the East European Anglo-Saxonist’s stock-in-trade.

Lara Farina (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, West Virginia University)

As a somewhat elder member of the House of BABEL, I’d like for us to develop structures that enable more distributed brainstorming, decision-making, and responsibility. I’m willing to help with that and then turn the steering over to other Legendary Children (from Paris is Burning–go watch it, or just ask Mike Johnson for his wonderful Santa Barbara paper). Besides that, I want to keep Babel extra-disciplinary, experimental, fun, and welcoming of a wide range of scholars, activists, artists, teachers, performers, and other enthusiasts.

Jonathan Forbes (Grad Student, English, University of California, Santa Barbara)

I greatly appreciated the opportunity to serve BABEL as a co-manager for its most recent meeting, “On the Beach” at UC Santa Barbara, and am eager to continue the momentum generated by our collective work. I myself work on late medieval political poetry, more specifically thinking about political deliberation as an expression of collective healing, and what initially drew me to BABEL was that it embodies this idea of deliberation as an agent for healing. As BABEL continues to grow, I see our main strength being our work as a deliberative body (re-thinking how we even talk to one another, insisting that our conversation expands beyond academia to engage with activists, artists, and those devoted to public service, and broadening our platforms for deliberation), and if elected, I would offer not only my commitment to these collective goals, but an administrative ability to work with an ever-more vast multiplicity of members to execute and embody these goals as our group both grows and thrives.

D. Gilson (Grad Student, English, George Washington University)

Given that my passion and work lives at the intersection of creative writing and contemporary (pop) cultural studies, I can bring a fresh and underrepresented perspective to BABEL; further, my connections to those trained or working in creative writing can build a conduit to new bodies excited to join the fray. As a poet and young otter, I work and play well with others, always striving to push the boundaries of traditional scholarship; as others within BABEL can attest, I also work diligently to support my peers in their endeavors. I would be honored to serve on your BABEL Steering Committee, and thank you in advance for considering my candidacy.

C.J. Gordon (Grad Student, English, University of California, Irvine)

My work addresses poiesis as a creative endeavor, a world-building exercise in thinking, making, and doing. Thus, I would steer the BABEL swarm towards engagements with other platforms for material construction: sound art, design, and architecture. As a recent Ph.D. and non-tenure track lecturer, I hope to cultivate scenes of affiliation, enjoyment, and speculation on the margins of the academy.

David Hadbawnik (Grad Student, English, SUNY Buffalo)

Over the past several years of finishing my PhD, organization and juggling a number of tasks has been a strong suit for me. I have successfully organized panels at BABEL and Kalamazoo; I started a new medievalist-oriented creative small press affiliated with punctum books, called eth press, in collaboration with Chris Piuma, Dan Remein, and Lisa Ampleman; and I am currently co-editing a special issue of postmedieval on contemporary poetics and medieval literature. In short, I work and play well with others, and would love to join a team steering BABEL into the glorious future.

Jonathan Hsy (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, George Washington University)

I’m proud of BABEL’s ethos of radical openness and how this group (along with postmedieval, punctum books/records, and “In The Middle” blog) has become a transformative force across medieval studies, critical theory, the arts, and other domains. I want to ensure we keep growing and changing by incorporating new voices and welcoming many kinds of people. While BABEL is delightfully queer and non-hierarchical and artistic and cross-disciplinary, I want future BABEL endeavors (events, venues, plenaries, themes, projects, etc.) to *also* deliberately engage more people of color and make events as accessible as possible.

Mary Kate Hurley (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, Ohio University)

I can offer to BABEL precisely what BABEL has always offered to me: support and thoughtful commentary always, criticism when warranted, and passion for thinking about questions both big and small. I can also offer to BABEL what I’ve come to think of as my characteristic academic and personal ability – I can, and will, talk to all (legitimate) sides of any argument or endeavor, and work to find a way for each side to thrive and support the others.

Michael Johnson (Tenure-Track Faculty, French, Central Washington University)

Current interests: erotic grammars, apocalypse, depression, fermented things, Arthurian feelings, shit, Prester John, queer criminality, queer precarity, baked things, toki pona, heterotopias. Linguistic foci: Latin, French, Occitan, Italian. I collaborated on organizing the first BABEL conference at UT Austin and am a longtime follower of all BABEL initiatives.

Boyda Johnstone (Grad Student, English, Fordham University)

I have long been inspired by BABEL’s commitment to the unconventional, the political, the interdisciplinary, the theoretical, and the unvoiced or unheard. I believe my personal dedication to social justice, my experience with and inclination towards collaborative work, and my commitment to theory and its political possibilities make me a viable candidate for the BABEL Steering Committee. In addition to writing a dissertation on posthumanism and dream visions, I am a dedicated feminist and active co-blogger for the popular Canadian academic blog Hook & Eye, and have spearheaded many initiatives intended to facilitate collaboration, community, and solidarity within (and without) my graduate program at Fordham, such as a graduate mentorship program, a graduate writing workshop series, and events in support of the Occupy Wall Street movement in 2011-2012.

Kathleen Coyne Kelly (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, Northeastern University)

Nothing like BABEL has ever existed in the academiverse, and this is quite an achievement. I’d like to continue to insure that we remain edgy, compassionate, open, provocative, unforgettable, kinetic, medieval and more.

Justin Kolb (Tenure-Track Faculty, English and Comparative Literature, The American University in Cairo)

I would like to see BABEL extend its reach geographically, cooperating with universities like mine in the developing world, and beyond. I would like to continue reach out to other academic fields and languages, as well as to artists and political movements (for example, I’d like to see the 2015 Toronto conference coordinate with Canada’s Idle No More indigenous justice movement). I’d also like to cultivate more direct political action, especially on behalf of academic labor and in support of education and the arts a valuable public goods. We need to keep building a society beyond the campus that will support the work we do.

Steve Mentz (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, St. John’s University)

The genius of BABEL to me is the group’s reckless openness to creativity in scholarship and intellectual life. I hope the Steering Committee can think through a longer time window than a single conference about how the Working Group can best incubate and bring forth creative work. Perfect BABEL moments may not always lend themselves to traditional or even emerging forms of scholarly publication, but I’d also like to think about helping this Committee curate a BABEL archive in various forms that would provide traces of past glories and incitements to future experiments.

Asa Simon Mittman (Tenure-Track Faculty, Art History, California State University, Chico)

I am a founding member of the Material Collective. I  have been an active BABELer since the organization’s inception, and have attended (and spoken at) all three BABEL Meetings. I believe in the value of close and careful interaction with the material objects that remain from the Middle Ages, in collaborative approaches to scholarship and teaching, and in hearty conviviality.

Susie Nakley (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, St. Joseph’s College)

I teach English literature at St. Joseph’s College in New York and study the politics of language and culture in Chaucer and medieval drama; yet, because the BABEL Working Group facilitates rigorous conversations about sensitive intellectual, political, and ethical problems better than any institution or mere professional association I’ve known, I often feel even more grateful for BABEL than for my t/t job. If elected, I will work to keep BABEL quirky and to increase our diversity by encouraging new member participation, drawing folks from our margins toward the heart of our group, and amplifying faint voices. To this end, I offer these campaign promises: homemade hummus, hypoallergenic puppies, homebrew, hugs, and alliteration for all!

Sharon O’Dair (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, University of Alabama)

I am honored to be nominated me for Babel’s Steering Committee!  Why am I a good choice for it?  Two reasons, I think. First, I have presented work at BABEL 2012 and 2014, and have published in postmedieval as an ecomaterialist. But I am not a medievalist—just a Shakespearean—and so I do not carry opinions about how the BABEL Working Group has made its way within the field of medieval studies, the friends the group has made, the people the group has alienated. Second, I have a lot of administrative experience, including that of managing a budget, having directed for a decade The Hudson Strode Program in Renaissance Studies at the University of Alabama. Establishing a Steering Committee is a step toward institutionalization and including one or more “outsiders” on the Committee is wise, I think. Especially as we try, in that move to institutionalization, to maintain BABEL’s quirkiness, its love of experiment and disruption!

Julie Orlemanski (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, University of Chicago)

My favorite thing about BABEL is its (or rather, our) ability to generate fun, new, unexpected, and less hierarchical forms of intellectual community. My priority on the steering committee would be to continue this, to continue developing and making accessible various forms of inclusive academic collectivity. I like to think that not just one set of ideas, or one group of people, defines BABEL, but that its consistency comes instead from our ongoing experiments in how scholarly sociality can be simultaneously more wild and more just.

Michael O’Rourke (Non-Academic visiting lecturer in Gender Studies at the Institute for Social Sciences and Humanities, Skopje, Macedonia; faculty of the Global Center for Advanced Studies; and fellow of the Global Arts and Ideas nexus)

What I can bring to the steering committee and the future of BABEL is almost 15 years of experience organizing hundreds of conferences, seminars and various other events including curating art exhibitions; a vast network of contacts worldwide; experience collaborating with others in various collectives (The(e)ories, REVERB, The Queer Planet assemblage DUST, SUCK); an intimate relationship with the BABEL Working Group having attended and spoken at all three biennial conferences so far.

Chris Piuma (Grad Student, Medieval Studies, University of Toronto)

BABEL has given me space and encouragement to (co-)create collaborative and intersectional projects (eth press, Grammar Rabble) between academics and nonacademics, between medievalists and nonmedievalists, and I want there to be more and I want to help foster more, more modes and more forms and more formats and more mores and more ands. I am particularly interested in fostering a BABEL where “academic” and “medieval” form but two of many plausible centers around which BABEL can be understood, and in encouraging projects that you are excited by which, at least at first, I find completely baffling and pointless, but which maybe I will grow to appreciate, or not—because I like your excitement even more than I like my own, and I trust you.

Dan Remein (Tenure-Track Professor, University of Massachusetts, Boston)

I will bring to the BABEL steering committee: my excitement for BABEL, which includes, of necessity, a radical hope for the humanities and the future of the human; commitments to and experience in integrating solidarity between Graduate Students, Non-Tenure Track Faculty, and Tenure-Track Faculty into the basic organization of BABEL projects; and, drawing on my own work, a continuing commitment to building spaces where adventurous artists and poets can collaborate with adventurous historians, literary scholars (of a wild range of stripes), and researchers in the sciences. BABEL has been, for me, a Pavilion of Marvels, and I would be thrilled to help continuing to pitch that tent again and again.

Angie Bennett Segler (Grad Student, English, New York University)

As a young academic hailing from a non-traditional medievalist background (I was trying to be a physicist and got distracted), I would hope to bring to the BABEL Steering Committee a fresh perspective on what scholarship and the Critical/Liberal Arts are and can be within a larger intellectual culture. Moreover, I have a lot of energy and enthusiasm for the work of shifting epistemic values, as BABEL is trying to do, and my own not so small bit of know-how on how to just get things done.

Marty Shichtman (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, Eastern Michigan University)

I’m interested in bringing BABEL back to its roots, re-opening its mission to be as inclusionary as possible. What that means is that we need to think about ways to make the conference economically accessible to faculty and students at less well-capitalized universities. Is this even possible? We all know the challenges. Are there any plausible solutions?

Karra Shimabukuro (Grad Student, English, New Mexico University)

I was a high school teacher and adjunct professor for fourteen years and operated as an independent scholar for three years before starting my PhD program. My current research traces folkloric figures, particularly the devil, through medieval and early modern texts and into popular culture. I think it’s both of these approaches- of inter and cross-disciplinary collaboration, as well as being deeply invested in the future of the academy which would makes me a good fit with BABEL’s work. I have a unique perspective on practical experiences and how technology and new innovations can carve out new spaces for moving forward. I think my desire and willingness to work across fields and interests would make me an asset

Karl Steel (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, Brooklyn College)

I’m a long-time BABEL member and want to help it continue to do well. If elected to the steering committee, I’m hoping to help share some of the labor of BABEL finances. My long-term goals for BABEL concentrate on its character as a working group, which means conceiving of conferences and other events as working communities, oriented towards shared endeavor and collaborative scholarship, involving both the BABEL community as well as other experimental scholarly groups, like the Material Collective.

Steven Swarbrick (Grad Student, English, Brown University)

What I see myself offering to the Steering Committee and to BABEL is a focus not only on the question, What tomorrow?, but also, Whose tomorrow? Looking prospectively, I want to help BABEL to envision ways of convoking a future “we” while addressing the need for sustainable (un)structures. Questions such as Should the working group be planning more events? Should it be offering mini grants to graduate students, non TT faculty, and Altac professionals? Should there be a digital newsletter? are some of the questions I hope to answer in a Steering Committee concerned not only with growing but also with securing lines of affiliation for years to come.

Haylie Swenson (Grad Student, English, George Washington University)

As a graduate student, I personally owe a lot—conference experience, a first publication, and many friendships—to BABEL’s commitment to nonhierarchical and interdisciplinary relationships, something I am particularly invested in, as my own work draws on critical animal studies, science studies, and medieval literature. The thing that has always drawn me most to BABEL is its emphasis on fostering junior scholars, non-tenure track faculty, and non-academics as full peers and partners in the intellectual community. As a member of the steering committee, I would be honored to help ensure that future junior and non-traditional scholars find BABEL to be the safe and welcoming place for cross-disciplinary engagement and exploration that I have always found it to be.

Brian Upton (Non-Academic)

I’m an outsider with this community.  I’m a professional game designer, not a medievalist or an academic.  However, my work on aesthetics and play spills over into questions of reception in the humanities. And, I’m very good at designing structured play experiences.

Elizabeth Randell Upton (Tenure-Track Faculty, Musicology, UCLA)

Like most BABEL members I am a medievalist, but unlike most I am also a musicologist.  I think I can offer the Steering Committee a variety of different perspectives – disciplinary,  institutional, methodological, and even personal.  As someone whose work usually involves non-verbal experiences, I think I can provide an interesting counterpoint to the larger discussion.

Diane Watt (Tenure-Track Faculty, English and Languages, University of Surrey)

Thanks to BABEL, Medieval Studies is no longer at the margins of scholarship, but is defining the terms of thinking in the humanities and beyond. If I were elected to the Steering Committee, I would be committed to continuing its work in offering researchers supportive spaces to court controversy, to think the unthought, and articulate the unspoken. In doing so I would draw on my extensive  experience of fostering interdisciplinary research (eg in my current roles as a member of the Gender and Medieval Studies Steering Group, as a member of the International Medieval Congress programming committee, and as a member of several editorial boards), and on my own personal experience of finding innovative ways to communicate controversial research (see, for example, my stand-up on You Tube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOSdWihRlHM&list=UU4fa8vPvrxhHivHSAEfC4Tw).

Cord Whitaker (Tenure-Track Faculty, English, Wellesley)

My commitment to BABEL is an ethical one. The spirit of study—literary, artistic, scientific—is play: the creativity to develop new ideas, the freedom to test them against established standards while also challenging those standards, the imagination to explore and delineate the genealogical lines, sometimes subtle and sometimes exclamatory, between old and new ideas. BABEL, with its acceptance of traditional modes of scholarship and encouragement of new modes, with its growing interest in challenging the divide between knowledge and material experience, embodies the playful spirit of study. This spirit has directed my own work, I encourage it in my students, and I see it as an ethical imperative that a space for it be sustained and nurtured for other scholars. BABEL is such a space, and as a member of the Steering Committee, I will work to steer it toward an ever more playful future.

Maggie Williams (Tenure-Track Faculty, Art History, William Paterson University)

As a founding member of the Material Collective, I can offer the BABEL Steering Committee strong links to similar modes of academic production in the fields of art history and the visual arts. In addition, I have 4 years’ professional experience and training as a union organizer. My work with organized labor taught me how to grow a movement, and I would love the opportunity to use those skills to help guide BABEL forward.

To vote, click here.

24
Oct

Call for nominations

nominatenowBABEL wants YOU! to help assemble a BABEL Working Group steering committee. This group will work separately from–though of course in concert with–the conference programming committees for BABEL 2015 in Toronto, BABEL 2017 on Saturn, and beyond. The steering committee will focus its attention on guiding BABEL into its gorgeous future.

Nominations are  sought for TWELVE bright and friendly innovators who work well with others.  The BABEL membership will vote on the slate of candidates to fill the 12 slots (at least 3 of which will be current grad students, non-tenure track faculty, and non-academics), with each position having a term of 2-3 years. We especially seek nominations of recent additions to the BABEL crew. 

Nominate yourself, nominate another (and don’t worry: we’ll contact your nominee to confirm their willingness to serve), but whatever you do, send your nominations to Myra Seaman ([email protected]) by the last moment of October (that is, the end of Friday, October 31). The election will take place the second week of November, to ensure it doesn’t dim the midterm elections taking place in the States the week before.

22
Aug

Program of BABEL Santa Barbara (16-18 October) available!

2014 Program

PROGRAM — 3rd BIENNIAL MEETING OF THE BABEL WORKING GROUP

[full program available below, but please head here for the complete BABEL Meeting website]

BABEL_Biennale_2014

[all images from Joni Sternbach, Surfland]

~ On the Beach: Precariousness, Risk, Forms of Life, Affinity, and Play at the Edge of the World  ~

[full description of conference HERE]

16-18 October 2014

University of California, Santa Barbara

Co-Sponsors: BABEL Working Group; College of Creative Studies, UCSB; College of Letters and Science, UCSB; Comparative Literature Program, UCSB; Department of Art, UCSB; Department of English, UCSB; Department of French & Italian, UCSB; Department of History, UCSB; Department of Spanish & Portugese, UCSB; Early Modern Center, UCSB; Film & Media Studies, UCSB; Germanic, Slavic and Semitic Studies, UCSB; Interdisciplinary Humanities Center, UCSB; Literature & Environment Center, UCSB; Literature & Mind Center, UCSB; Medieval and Early Modern Studies Institute, The George Washington University; Medieval Literatures Center, UCSB; Medieval Studies, UCSB; Mellon Sawyer Seminar, UCSB; punctum booksPalgrave Macmillan; and Transcriptions Center, UCSB.

REGISTER HERE [regular faculty] and HERE [students and non-regular faculty] by SEPTEMBER 15.

Go HERE for post-September 15 LATE registration.

*If you are UCSB faculty or student, there is no charge for attending the conference; if you want to pre-register and have a name-badge and conference program set aside for you, please send an email to Eileen Joy: [email protected] Read more »

4
Aug

postmedieval 5.2: Comic Medievalisms

Special Issue Edited by Louise D’Arcens10295333_696208457083372_508382200230097689_o

ISSUE EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION

Medievalist laughter
Louise D’Arcens

ARTICLES

Said in jest: Who’s laughing at the Middle Ages (and when)?
David Matthews

You had to be there: Anachronism and the limits of laughing at the Middle Ages
Louise D’Arcens

Medieval comic relief: Cannibal cow, duck’s neck and carry on Joan of Arc
Stephen Knight

‘Simply to amuse the reader’: The humor of Walter Scott’s Reformation
Andrew Lynch

One does not simply laugh in Middle Earth: Sacrificing humor in Peter Jackson’s The Lord of the Rings
Brantley L Bryant

Valhallolz: Medievalist humor on the Internet
Kim Wilkins

ARTICLES

Ella’s bloody eagle: Sharon Turner’s History of the Anglo-Saxons and Anglo-Saxon history
Donna Beth Ellard

Towards the Middle Ages to come: The temporalities of walking with W. Morris, H. Adams and especially H.D. Thoreau
Benjamin A Saltzman

BOOK REVIEW ESSAY

Comedy in translation: Politics and poetics
Nicole Sidhu

[see postmedieval site at Palgrave for more information on this and other issues]
4
Aug

Kalamazoo 2015 CALL FOR PAPERS: Quantum Medievalisms // Dinshaw’s “Chaucer’s Sexual Poetics, 1990-2015″

 by EILEEN JOY
I want to share with everyone here the more detailed Call for Papers for BABEL’s and postmedieval’s sessions for the 50th International Congress on Medieval Studies to be held in Kalamazoo, Michigan from May 14-17, 2015. Although the official, printed CFP lists me as the primary contact person [[email protected]], please send your proposal and Participant Information Form by September 15th to the persons listed below who actually dreamed up these sessions [and if any proposals reach me, I will, don't worry, forward them on]:1. Quantum Medievalisms [roundtable] // Sponsor: postmedieval: a journal of medieval cultural studies // Organizer: Angela Bennett Segler, New York Universityproposals to: [email protected]

*it should be noted that this session is part of a cluster of sessions spread out across many sponsoring organizations on Medieval Materialisms [see and join, if interested, the Group page for that on Facebook HERE]

This panel uses a direct parallel with Quantum Physics to prompt interrogations of basic structures of figuring matter and temporality within scholarship of the Middle Ages. As the name suggests, the idea has a dual legacy. In classical Latin, “quantum” is the accusative form of the adjective “quantus,” usually paired with “tantus” to indicate questions of what size, how much, or magnitude of greatness. In its adverbial counterpart, “quantum” designated a comparison of quantity: “as far as,” “as much as,” “as great as.” Even from the Patristic writers, though, we find that “quantum” has become a noun that is no longer a comparison or a description of quantities, but a stand-in for quantity itself. In contemporary culture, the word “quantum,” carries with it the connotations of modern physics that, beginning with Einstein and Planck, define basic units of light and energy (respectively) as “quanta.” Quantum physics deals primarily with the level of the atomic and subatomic nature of all matter, at which levels the classical distinctions between matter and energy, wave and particle collapse completely. All things—light, energy and matter — are simultaneously waves and particles, and due to Bohr’s principle of complementarity it is the observer who intervenes via her scientific apparatus and determines what she is observing. One of the ramifications of Bohr’s interpretation is the idea of quantum entanglement. Quantum entanglement means that all elements of a system are simultaneously affected as the system is affected. As those elements disperse — an inevitability according to the laws of thermodynamics — the system itself does not disassemble but becomes diffuse. Action upon the system will still simultaneously affect every iota of the system, even if those elements are light years apart. Read more »

9
Apr

DONATE! to BABEL’s Spring 2014 Fundraising Campaign

babelfund[Click here to donate now! ]

 

by EILEEN JOY

You might think, and some days it’s true, that the BABEL Working Group runs on Manhattan cocktails, WD-40, ramen, loose change, the kindness of strangers, old Talking Heads albums, matches, a glitter ball, chewing gum, and a few guitars. Indeed, without institutional or foundational funding, but with a lot of elbow grease in the wee hours of the night, the BABEL Working Group has, since 2004, worked very hard to: 1) develop new co-disciplinary, nomadic, and convivial confraternities between the humanities, sciences, social sciences, and the fine arts (both within and beyond the academy), 2) to build shelters for humanist and post/humanist vagabonds, 3) to foster a politics of friendship both within and beyond the University, and 4) to create new spaces for para-academic alliances (such as our biennial conference, our symposia series, but also our press punctum books and or new sound label punctum records).But the fact of the matter is, we cannot keep doing everything we have been doing, not to mention continue to build even more new spaces and events and projects and platforms, without some sort of regular fund-raising campaign, which we’ve decided to undertake beginning this year, in both spring and fall of each year. It’s important to us that we never charge membership dues [although many people have urged us to do just that], because as idealistic and foolish as it might sound, I’ve always envisioned BABEL as an attempt to put theory into practice — more specifically, to see if it’s possible to build and sustain something like Deleuze and Guattari’s “desiring-assemblage,” which of its very nature must have propensities, trajectories, flows [and also breaks in the flows], attachments, detachments, reattachments, agglomerations, itineraries, ETC. that cannot be predicted in advance nor managed bureaucratically nor controlled. As such, all manner of persons must be invited to jump on, and also jump off, with no impediments to their movements in and out of the spaces we are creating to foster new modes and experimental forms of creative intellectual work. We don’t want officers. We don’t want Robert’s Rules. We don’t want dues. Consider, also, that without any of that — and again, without any institutional support [although some, like GW-MEMSI have generously helped fund our biennial meeting and social events] — we’ve managed to do the following: Read more »

8
Apr

postmedieval 4.4: Premodern Flesh

Edited by Holly Crocker and Kathryn Schwarz FLESH_Cover

EDITOR’S INTRODUCTION

In the Flesh (Holly Crocker [University of South Carolina])

ARTICLES

Melting Flesh, Living Words (Jay Zysk [University of South Florida])

The Temporal Excesses of Dead Flesh (Cynthia Turner Camp [University of Georgia])

Carnival in The Merchant of Venice (Jonathan Goldberg [Emory University])

The Curious Pleasures of the Heroic Corpse (Kathryn Schwarz [Vanderbilt University])

Scattered Remains and Paper Bodies: Margaret Cavendish and the Siege of Colchester (Frances E. Dolan [University of California, Davis])

Fleshing out the text: The Transcendent Manuscript in the Digital Age (Elaine Treharne [Stanford University])

Spirited Flesh: The Animation and Hybridization of Flesh in the Early Modern Imaginary (Emily L. King [Vanderbilt University])

Hi Mho Jhi Kudd: Thomas Stephens’s Translated Flesh, or, Coconuts in Goa (Jonathan Gil Harris [Ashoka University])

[see postmedieval site at Palgrave for more information on this and other issues]