|Participation (10% of course grade)||Resources|
|Regular Writing (15% of course grade)||Academic Integrity|
|Critical Writing (45% of course grade)||Grading scale|
|Exams (30% of course grade)|
Attendance is vital to your success a class such as this one, since classroom discussion will be our opportunity to “do something” with the texts you read. Class discussion should come as a reward for doing the preparation before class and for being present. You should expect to participate in an active and engaged classroom experience, twice a week. Make sure you are in class, ready to begin discussion, when class is scheduled to start. Because I take roll at the very beginning of class, tardiness gets recorded as absence unless you approach me after class to confirm your attendance.
Nothing can replace your experience in the classroom, collectively generating with the rest of the class an understanding of the course material. I realize, however, that there may come a time when you need to miss a class. If you miss no more than two classes and are an active participant, your participation grade will not suffer. After that point, however, you cannot be participating at an effective level. So be warned: if you miss more than two classes, I will be concerned for your grade and your general well-being and will email you. Bear in mind that if you do miss class, you are still responsible for that day’s work, including turning in (on time) any work due, understanding assignments, and getting the gist of class discussion. And when you’re not here, you’re reducing your likelihood of success in the course generally and are directly affecting your participation grade and in-class writing grade.
If you know that you struggle with attendance, for any reason at all, please discuss that with me early in the semester during our out-of-class meeting. (For more details on that meeting, see below.)
- Read the assigned material listed on the schedule, including any introductory material.
- Respond: Spend time developing your own sense of what you have read, by looking back over it once you’ve finished the reading, and considering what you might say about the text. A good way to do this is by writing a blog post, which is required before every class meeting (see details below).
- Prepare for textual engagement in class: Bring to class the book(s) from which you did the day’s reading. These should be marked up, to record the experience of your reading so you can call on that when you’re in class discussion. [Special note: On those days when the readings are assigned from PDFs rather than from books, be prepared for me to be paying special attention to ensure you’re not being distracted by things other than the text, on your screen.]
- Prepare to write in class: Be ready to write for 6 minutes at the start of class. Preparation should be mental and physical, with pen and paper or, alternatively, with a laptop or tablet from which you can submit your response to me immediately on OAKS.
Required meeting: Many of you will find yourselves coming to meet with me regularly outside of class, but for those of you who wouldn’t automatically do so, I require an out-of-class meeting early in the semester so you can discover how painless and even enjoyable it is. It also ensures that you know where my office is. This meeting is informal and has no specific content. Simply show up and chat with me for 10-15 minutes. This can happen during my office hours (T 1:30-2:30 and R 9:30-10:30) when you can simply drop in as suits your schedule. If my office hours clash with your schedule, then you’ll need to email me to arrange an alternative meeting time, but that won’t be difficult.
Blog questions + comments:
Before every class for which you are assigned a reading, you will post a response on the course blog. Most weeks, this will mean you will post twice: before Tuesday’s class, and before Thursday’s class. Frequent and informal student writing has a number of goals:
- to prepare everyone for a productive in-class discussion of the material;
- to encourage both written and spoken informal discussion of the material;
- to allow for those who are less active in-class participants the opportunity to participate in alternate ways;
- to provide low-stakes opportunities for students to experiment with a range of types of written responses to the material.
Scheduled blog questions: Each week, 2 students will be responsible for posting to the blog questions concerning that week’s readings, for all of the other students in class to respond to. Each questioner will post one question before Tuesday’s class, based on the readings for that class meeting, and also one question before Thursday’s class, based on the readings for that class meeting.The questions must be posted at least 24 hours before the class meeting (that is to say, before 10:50 on Monday and Wednesday). This means for the week you are the questioner, you will need to do the reading in advance so you’re ready to post a question early.
Such questions should not have a single, “correct” answer. Instead, they should offer students the chance to discuss further an idea or issue raised in the reading, more like a prompt you would have for an essay assignment. All students in class will respond to one of these two questions, so each question will need to offer many possible responses. [Sign up for your turn as blog questioner here.]
I recommend each question consist of 2-3 sentences: the first one making clear the subject matter (the central issue or concept that the question focuses on), and the next sentence or two presenting the question clearly. Further, the question should not simply ask for student opinion in general (“did you like the poem?” or “what did you think of the protagonist?”), but should instead require respondents to interpret and analyze the text in order to respond. If our subject matter for class happened to be, for instance, the short children’s poem “I never saw a purple cow. I never hope to see one. But I can tell you anyhow, I’d rather see than be one,” unproductive questions would be, “Why did the poet choose to make the cow purple?” or “Would you rather be or see a purple cow?” These simply ask for student opinion in general, rather than encouraging detailed analysis. A productive question would ask, instead, “What kinds of cultural values does this poem pass on to the young audience it addresses?” or “What does the ‘anyhow’ seem to add to the meaning of the poem, making it more than filler to maintain the beat of the poem’s meter?” Successful blog questions might also draw students’ attention to confusing or ambiguous parts of the reading and seek clarification. Your questions will be graded based on how well they encourage a range of student responses (which depends on their being expressed clearly, needless to say).
Blog comments: When you are not scheduled to ask a question, you will select one of the two questions posted for each class and produce a response to that before coming to class. You will always have at least 24 hours to do this. Your response should take the form of a comment on the question, which will appear as a post.
These responses should be 4-6 sentences long. Your comment should respond directly to the question and will be even more successful if it pushes readers’ attention in new directions. This means you will need to read others’ responses before writing and posting your own. You will often find that your own response winds up responding not only to the original question but to the comments others have made. (This also means that the sooner you post, the less likely you are to find someone already having written what you would like to.) To receive credit, your comment:
- must not repeat what someone has already said in a comment and
- must make at least one specific reference to the reading on which the question is based (for instance, a direct quote of at least 2 words but no more than a complete sentence, with the line number [for a poem] or page number [for anything not a poem] listed in parentheses afterwards).
A successful response to the first appropriate question on the purple cow poem might be something like:
The repetition of the “I,” which is the subject for each verb, makes readers focus on the speaker, whose attitude toward purple cows is thus emphasized. When the speaker says, “I can tell you anyhow” (3), the audience is expected to care about the speaker’s values, and the speaker’s resistance to purple cows seems to value the “normal,” the “natural,” the way things are. The speaker wouldn’t even like to see such a thing, much less be so abnormal.
Blog questions will receive specific comments and a grade from me as part of the grading process. Daily blog comments will receive only a grade.
(For some help with the logistics of blogging, see the get blogging! page)
In-class writing: At the start of each class, you will perform informal writing in response to a question I will present on the day’s assigned reading. You will have 6 minutes to respond to the question. Your main goal will be to call on your recollection of the reading (these will not be open-book) to respond directly and specifically, demonstrating your understanding of what you read. These daily writings will get your thoughts flowing for the day’s classroom discussion. If you’d like to improve the quality of your responses (and of your grade), please see me during office hours for personal assistance.
Each written project has a deadline (date and time) listed on the course schedule. You have up to 24 hours after that time to submit your work.
First Project (15% of course grade)
This paper will be 5-7 pages long. A complete assignment for the paper will be posted early in the semester. You have the option of revising this paper. If you choose to revise, you must meet with me during office hours (or schedule an alternative time to meet) to discuss the revision. This revision will be due 10 days after the graded papers are returned to the class. The grade for the assignment will then be the average of the original grade and the revision grade.
Final Project (30% of course grade)
The Final Project for this course consists of two parts: an extended researched analysis (75% of project grade) and accompanying annotated bibliography+proposal (25% of project grade).
The extended researched analysis will be on a topic you develop to suit your interests, based on the ongoing focus of the course materials and discussion. You may find that a blog post and the comments it generates leads you toward a question you’d like to pursue in further depth, or you might investigate a particular theme or text addressed by the course, or you might make connections between medieval experiences and attitudes to something from another time and/or place, including our own.
The annotated bibliography is produced as part of your research for your final extended research analysis. The bibliography must contain at least 8 secondary sources (6 of these must be critical resources such as articles or book chapters; bear in mind that if you use two chapters from one book, that counts for two sources, with each one listed separately on the Annotated Bibliography). Only 1 of your sources may be an article assigned for class discussion. (Your final paper will include at least 5 of these or other such sources, 3 of which must be critical articles.) We will spend class time looking at sample annotated bibliographies and proposals.
A more detailed assignment for all elements in the Final Project will appear on the blog later in the semester.
There will be two exams. In advance of both exams, you will receive an exam preparation guide, and we will discuss sample exam responses together in class.
Midterm Exam (10% of course grade)
Cumulative Final Exam (20% of course grade)
Office hours (5 College Way, room 203) are reserved for you to drop in as suits your schedule, to discuss your writing and/or the course: T 1:30-2:30 and R 9:30-10:30. I have plenty of other availability, though, so please email me suggesting an alternative meeting time, at seamanm[at]cofc.edu .
Preferred name and pronouns: I will gladly honor your request to address you by the name and gender pronouns of your choice. Please advise me of this early in the semester via your college-issued email account or during office hours so that I may make the appropriate notation on my class list.
Food, Housing, and other material resources: Any student who has difficulty affording groceries or accessing sufficient food to eat every day, or who lacks a safe and stable place to live, and believes this may affect their performance in the course, is urged to contact the Dean of Students office (Stern Center, 3rd floor) for support, including the Student Food/Temporary Housing Assistance.. Furthermore, please notify me if you are comfortable in doing so, so I might offer additional resources.
Academic accommodation for a documented disability can be arranged through the Center for Disability Services: 843-953-1431, Lightsey Center, Suite 104. If you are approved for accommodations, please let me know as soon as possible so we can organize appropriate arrangements.
The Writing Lab is located on the first floor of Addlestone Library, within the Center for Student Learning. Here you will find many resources for your writing (for this and other classes): handouts, reference books, sample bibliographies, and consultants who have been trained to assist you in generating materials for your essay, organizing your ideas and materials, revising and editing your writing, and any step in the writing process. You can find information, including hours and schedule, at the link above.
All students, needless to say, must follow the College of Charleston’s academic integrity policy, which forbids cheating, attempted cheating, and plagiarism. Any case of suspected cheating or plagiarism (on any written response for the course) will be sent to the College’s Honor Board, and any student found guilty will receive a grade of XF, indicating failure of the course due to academic dishonesty.
“Recycled” papers written for other courses are not acceptable in this class.
College of Charleston Honor Code and Academic Integrity, from the Student Handbook:
Lying, cheating, attempted cheating, and plagiarism are violations of our Honor Code that, when identified, are investigated. Each incident will be examined to determine the degree of deception involved.
Incidents where the instructor determines the student’s actions are related more to a misunderstanding will handled by the instructor. A written intervention designed to help prevent the student from repeating the error will be given to the student. The intervention, submitted by form and signed both by the instructor and the student, will be forwarded to the Dean of Students and placed in the student’s file.
Cases of suspected academic dishonesty will be reported directly by the instructor and/or others having knowledge of the incident to the Dean of Students. A student found responsible by the Honor Board for academic dishonesty will receive a XF in the course, indicating failure of the course due to academic dishonesty. This grade will appear on the student’s transcript for two years after which the student may petition for the X to be expunged. The student may also be placed on disciplinary probation, suspended (temporary removal) or expelled (permanent removal) from the College by the Honor Board.
Students should be aware that unauthorized collaboration–working together without permission– is a form of cheating. Unless the instructor specifies that students can work together on an assignment, quiz and/or test, no collaboration during the completion of the assignment is permitted. Other forms of cheating include possessing or using an unauthorized study aid (which could include accessing information via a cell phone or computer), copying from others’ exams, fabricating data, and giving unauthorized assistance.