We were talking Tuesday about the effectiveness of conduct texts in Medieval England and today. It was mentioned that we can’t really have a generalized idea of whether or not they worked in instructing members of the gentry just like people from the future wouldn’t be able to deduce whether works that carry a similar message today work or not. It seemed as if the class was trying to draw parallels between literature today and literature then. The consensus was that conduct texts are not the primary source of literary enlightenment today, since the fictional novel has taken over. But we do still have texts that could be considered morality driven and that clearly instruct their readers. Children’s Literature, especially fairy tales, was a genre that was mentioned as being very didactic at times as well as many religious texts like bible studies or devotional tools (for the Christian faith). I can’t help but think that scholars of 21st century literature hundreds of years from now will consider many texts floating around in our society to be didactic even if we don’t necessarily consider them so, or pay them any mind. I think what is important, what the parallel that I’m drawing between our century and the 15th, is that these texts exist then and now. We still very much live in a society that is focused on what is socially proper and morally sound. We, as a society, are still very much focused on social etiquette. When I was in middle school, my honors English class was forced to participate in an extracurricular course in which the book 7 habits for the high effective teen was taught. It highlighted what you should do in terms of school and studying habits. What you should do in peer pressured situations… if this book isn’t a modern day version of conduct texts, I don’t know what is.
It just seemed to me that the general consensus was that conduct texts were completely out of fashion and out dated in our society. But I think that they are very much alive and well, just as much as they were in Medieval England. We might not recognize them as easily in our own time, because we are incapable of placing ourselves outside of it, but I think many years from now people would be able to draw parallels between the conduct texts of medieval England and the ones now.
It helped me put these conduct texts like How the Good Wife and How the Good Father into better perspective in terms of their effectiveness when I thought about conduct texts in our own society. Some would consider them highly effective, others would not. I can still remember my mother reading me All Mine Bunny and warning against the dangers of selfishness. I’m not sure I’ll ever forget it, but others may not have been affected by this terrifying story of loneliness. I think the same would be true of Medieval Englanders. Not everyone was going to take these conduct texts to heart. They were all individuals then, just as we are now. I guess I caught myself thinking that these texts were like law, that they were universally studied and abided by, but that can’t be true. That would be like assuming every Medieval Englander shared the same brain.
Contact info
seamanm{at}cofc{dot}edu
22A Glebe Street, Room 102
953-5760
hours: T 11-12 R 3-4:30-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Research for penguin brief « hollysavagemedia2012and13 on What Makes a Knight?: Exploring the Characteristics of Knighthood in the texts of Ashmole 61
- architectos en Girona on Marshal McLuhan for Medieval Times
- arquirectura Barcelona on 29 March: Jessica Ellis (McGuire)
- Architecto En Barcelona on Understanding Chaucer In Terms of Ashmole 61
- ADT Corpus Christi on Women in the Middle Ages aka My Paper Topic!
Archives
Categories
Meta
I definitely agree and I feel that modern didactic texts extend much further than Children’s literature. Any book store has an extensive “how to” section, and it does not just consist of systematic instructions but also opinion ones such as “how to loose weight,” “how to get rich,” or “how to raise children:” advice that not everyone would agree with. And there are many, many books like The Secret that consist of spiritual guidance that SURELY not everyone would agree with. And aren’t most magazine’s didactic texts? Aren’t the cover article titles all “how to’s” or “top tens?” Basically, there are many examples of didactic texts today, maybe more than in the Middle Ages. I think Leslie makes an excellent point saying just like now, we must recognize that just because these texts exist, does not mean everyone agreed with them. We can even compare the popularity of How the Goodwife Taught her Daughter to the popularity of The Secret, as it proves popularity does not mean total acceptance.