In a rather random search for modern parallels of the ancient Roman practice of Augury, I came across the following blog:
Reading Birds
Strange, no? I need to investigate more closely, but am thinking it is possibly satire. Then again, there are some rather strange birds out there. For example:
Nova Roma
Now, I’m all for drawing parallels between the ancient and the modern worlds, for invigorating curiosity about Ancient Rome through fun and creativity, but, sorry, this is just a little too serious for my taste.
September 8, 2009
I just started Bronson and Merryman’s Nurture Shock.
I’ve only read the first chapter but find the basic premise thought-provoking. In a nutshell, B and M argue that today’s parents (those of the past 15 years or so) over-praise their children in order to boost self-esteem. Non-specific praise (”you’re so smart”) or constant praise have, they argue, contribute to the opposite desired effect: these kids actually lack motivation and persistance, prone to avoid activities that may result in failure. Constant or empty praise, argue B and N, result in a fear and inability to deal with failure (so protective of their kids’ esteem are such parents). Instead kids whose parents praise their effort or offer constructive, specific praise are more like to persist at an activity and strive for achievement. The argument is a dynamic one and I’ve merely simplified it here. B and M provide the most recent evidence in sociological and psychological studies as their support and offer an insightful counterbalance to the current trend of parenting and positive reinforcement. We should be praising our kids, so the authors say, in a specific manner (”I really liked how you tried to color within the lines”) and avoid generalizations (”You’re so smart”) which over time become empty flattery which even the youngest children can discern.
I find this all interesting not only from the parental perspective but also from the professor perspective. Will B and M’s research carry over to how we encourage our students in their academic pursuits?
I need to re-read the chapter and contemplate it more deeply. The book, I think, will prove to be a stimulating read.
August 31, 2009
It’s quite possible this blog could become a serious time-sapper for me. Still, if I’m going to require my satire students to maintain blogs I should set a good example. Or at least attempt to set a good example. I’ve decided my goals for this blog are the following:
1) to serve as my webpage
2) to serve as a venue for posting articles and news of interest, both classical and otherwise (usually as they relate to the material I’m teaching)
3) to offer commentary and insight on the readings, class prep, and whatever research I can manage to accomplish during the regular academic year amidst 3 classes/3 preps, 2 campus-wide committees, and 2 toddlers.
4) to inspire students (and colleagues) to engage in the fine art of curiosity and intellectual dialogue
August 21, 2009