13 Words to Incorporate into Your Life

1. Love

always give it and you will receive it in abundance

2. Passion

you either have it or you don’t, but if you don’t, find it

3. Trust

if one never gives it, one will never receive it

4. Honor

the ability to keep sacred what is right, through all situations

5. Integrity

Represent yourself well, represent others even better

6. Perseverance

everyone has the capability to achieve it, yet few realize their capability

7. Loyalty

above all be loyal to what is important to you, or you will have nothing of importance

8. Honesty

be true to yourself, and others will be honest in return

9. Leadership

the wisdom to take a stand or a seat

10. Pride

never display it excess, but apply it to everything you do

11. Beauty

never take it for granted, for it never lasts

12. Intelligence

few have it, even fewer demonstrate it

13. Charm

your wing man if tough situations

I tried to create a personal rendition of Benjamin Franklin’s 13 Virtues. Although my version isn’t necessarily based on virtues, it isn’t completely against the idea either. Rather, my list of words gives a new perspective on a way to think about things. My list is a grouping of definitions as well as a manual on how to use them. For instance, I do not define love, but I state that love is something one has to give, before one can receive it. Love has to be given as well as received, otherwise it isn’t love. I realize my one liners may resemble the wording that can be found on any motivational or “deep thought” poster, which may allude to their lameness. But, perhaps I should not even “flatter my vanity” like Franklin to think that my thoughts could even be compared to those, which are made into posters, but then again Franklin turned alright.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on 13 Words to Incorporate into Your Life

Benjamin Franklin and Agency: This Man was a Beast

Reading Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography (which I think is hilarious, by the way) I was thoroughly impressed by this amazing and quirky Renaissance man. I enjoy his writing style and subtle sarcasm and wit.  My over enthusiastic like of him may be due to his shining personality, or perhaps it’s because we just got through reading the Puritans, I don’t know. I think one of the reasons I like him so much is because he was an active participant of his own life rather than a woe-is-me type that felt hopeless and helpless about his condition and fate. Benjamin Franklin was by no means a “passive subject of social structure or unconscious transmitters of cultural scripts and models of identity” (54, Sidonie and Smith Reading Autobiography). Not only was Franklin an actor of his life, he was the director, screenwriter, costume designer, everything. He clearly had a strong faith in God and was not at all an atheist or agnostic but he did not believe in sitting quietly and letting life happen to him, he accomplished more in his one lifetime than most of us can even imagine. Just thinking about all his scientific inventions and theories and political activism and musical talents and authorship with the printing business, etc. etc. makes me want to take a nap. Did he not sleep or something? Did he  wear a cape and secretly fight crime on the side? Who knows, but what I do know is that he is the definition of AGENT.

 

I found his 13 Virtues to be most compelling and instructive in how we can make the most out of our lives as well. Socrates was the one who said “An unexamined life is not worth living” and Benjamin Franklin examined his life, thoroughly. His daily schedule included self-improvement and practices. I think we can all take a cue from this intense self-examination to make the most of our lifetimes and be all we can be. I am inspired to be more consistent with my journaling (to keep track of my life, so I can examine it) and to make a conscious effort to better myself and the world I live in.

 

And for all of you that are interested in doing the same, I recommend this lovely little list:  50 Life Secrets and Tips

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Comments Off on Benjamin Franklin and Agency: This Man was a Beast

Ben Franklin’s Virtue

In Benjamin Franklin’s Autobiography, his thirteen points of Virtue indicate the notion of striving for “moral Perfection,” which does not always match “Custom” (84). Franklin calls for social etiquette, such as not drinking too much or contributing to a conversation that does not “benefit others or your self” (85). Franklin’s other virtues involve physical cleanliness and smart economical choices (85-86). Franklin deems sex only pertinent for reproduction and “Health”; another interesting virtue is not letting “Trifles” or inevitable pitfalls bring down one’s morality (85). Franklin’s motive behind his virtues is self-improvement and being the best possible version of himself (84-86). He wants to come as close as he can to the “Humility” of “Jesus and Socrates” (86).

Franklin rejects organized religion, and in these virtues, he focuses more on the self than salvation through “the Deity” (82). Using Smith and Watson’s definition on authority, Franklin is pretty bold to assert that his list of virtues improves the “Good” of “Man,” though the community should be attending church services, except for him (82-83). Franklin’s “‘right’” to spout off what he deems virtuous is questionable when he does not practice his own opinions (RA, 237; BF, 83).

Franklin’s beliefs are more contemporary than the Puritans. Puritanism based itself on scripture, and Franklin’s mention of Socrates, one of the most famous Greek philosophers, illustrates his more progressive perspective. The Puritans believed that only a select few would be saved by God, so it did not matter how virtuous one lived their life or not, because it probably would not matter in the long run. Ben Franklin believed in bettering the self through self-examination, going as far as keeping track of his daily “committed” virtues (87). His method puts his “Faults” in print, and he attempts to change how people view him, such as in conversation to not seem so “proud” (90, 94-95). Franklin admits that attaining moral perfection, (the ultimate hurtle is getting over one’s pride) is not realistic (95).

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Ben Franklin’s Virtue

It’s All About the Benjamin Baby

Reading The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin and comparing it to the spiritual autobiographies of the Puritans has brought to light what Smith and Watson refer to as audience. That is not to say that the juxtaposition of the two styles raises questions as to who the texts are clearly addressed to. Rather, it is interesting to compare the belief systems of the competing texts’ contemporary readers as they relate to the question of self examination vs. self improvement.

At the very beginning of Franklin’s narrative, he admits that his writing may “a good deal gratify [his] own vanity.” Written in 1771, Franklin’s first chapter was produced while Puritan belief was still rampant in America. Franklin believes that vanity “is often productive of good to the possessor.” This represents a fundamental shift from Puritan religious beliefs to a more Jeffersonian mode of thought.

Puritan texts engage in self-examination often with the goal of rooting out their worldly vanity. Oftentimes, Puritan autobiographies include the author chastising themselves for grieving over the loss of a loved one, lamenting that their sadness is misplaced on worldly affections. Obviously, Franklin’s autobiography does not attempt self-examination in the hopes of rooting out his personal vanity. Instead, the autobiography serves as a counter to Puritan spirituality even going so far as to suggest that “it would not be altogether absurd if a man were to thank God for his vanity.”

Sentiments such as this would never be within Puritan writings. Yet Franklin’s autobiography is being produced alongside such spiritual texts. Thus, the existence of the two points to a split within American readership. On one hand, Puritan religious writings were still popular, illustrated as Franklin references revival preaching. On the other, Franklin was a popular colonial figure who was surrounded by like minded founding fathers. Ultimately, the existence of the two different types of texts showcases a literary public divided between religious introspection and pragmatic personal development.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on It’s All About the Benjamin Baby

Franklin’s Religion, somewhere between Jesus and Socrates.

Ben Franklin seems to form his own religious scripts around this idea of self-improvement through self-examination, which would appear to resemble the Puritan method of self-examination by confessing your sins; however, as Franklin recognizes his faults he also recognizes the potential to correct them, thus improving his moral being without feeling so guilt stricken as a Puritan would considering their notion of Total Depravity.  Franklin’s strive for self-improvement manifests itself in several ways: devoting Sundays to studying and self-contemplation rather than observing the Sabbath, creating a list of virtues, recording positive examples of these virtues, and marking his daily faults, which gives him the opportunity to literally erase away his imperfections.  Moral perfection is what every Puritan aspired to obtain and shows in their deep anxiety over the human’s condition of being naturally sinful, but their problem was they couldn’t see the potential to overcome their vices because of the strict Puritan doctrines such as the predestination of the elect and limited atonement.  Franklin’s self-improvement gives him a sense of spiritual satisfaction the same way the Puritan’s used their confessions and conversion stories. Despite his attempts to reach moral perfection, Franklin admits he “fell far short of it, yet…by the Endeavour of it made a better and happier Man,” which is similar to the Puritans sense of gratitude after feeling the grace of God in the interpretation of their conversions (92).  Franklin had religion in mind when he set out to create this list of virtues and track them, even during his process of self-examination he allowed the advice of a Quaker to alter his moral script when pride was introduced and added humility to his list of vices.  His precept to Pride states “Imitate Jesus and Socrates” which I think perfectly sums up Franklin’s theology that combines reason with spiritual morality (86).  Once the list is complied, Franklin believes “that it might be serviceable to People in all Religions” because he deliberately decided against including “any of the distinguishing Tenets of any particular Sect,” granted his justification of this reads as prideful when he says, “I had purposely avoided them; for being fully persuaded of the Utility and Excellence of my Method” (93).  Regardless of his motives for wanting to obtain “moral perfection,” be it for his own self-improvement or that of people of all religions, Franklin adhered to his daily examination with the determination and deep internal reflection as seen in any Puritan confession.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Franklin’s Religion, somewhere between Jesus and Socrates.

Is Benjamin Franklin a Puritan?

No.  But from Puritan autobiography to Benjamin Franklin, there is a noticeable change in what Watson and Smith call the ideological “I”.  In Reading Autdbiography, they define the ideological “I” as the “mobile positionalities of the ‘I’” or in other words, the cultural scripts at play on the author, the lens through which the “I” sees itself.  However, in both the case of the Puritans and Franklin, their ideological “I”s operate in unique ways.

In the case of the Puritans, their religion acts as their ideological “I”.  Their lives are filtered through God; everything from disaster to dinner is handed down directly from the Almighty.  Franklin, perhaps as a cultural reaction or through pure cynicism, achieves an ideological “I” that is polar to the Puritans.  Franklin sees the world through a scientific and logical lens that removes the “God” influence that is so present with the Puritans.  Instead, Franklin takes the control of his life away from God and places himself and, most importantly, his reason in the driver’s seat.

For instance, he allows himself to eat fish again after years of being a vegetarian because, he reasons, fish eat each other so why can’t humans, “if you eat one another, I don’t see why we mayn’t eat you.”  But in this respect, Franklin is not so different from the Puritans.  While they justified their lives through God, Franklin views his life through reason.  For example, after he reasons the fish edible, Franklin says, “So convenient a thing it is to be a reasonable Creature, since it enables one to find or make a Reason for every thing one has a mind to do.”  Franklin has replaced God with reason as his most influential ideological “I”.  And like the Puritan’s God, Franklin’s Reason is equally pervasive in his life.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Is Benjamin Franklin a Puritan?

Franklin’s Deism … Distant Love of God, Close Love of Self

Benjamin Franklin’s deism emerges, surprisingly, out of a semi-traditional belief system. In Autobiography, he situates his own religious principles by comparing them to the Presbyterian belief system. He denies “some of the Dogmas of that Persuasion,” but upholds what he perceives to be the “Essentials of every religion” (82) – those being divine creation, the golden rule, the eternal soul, and justice. So, although his deistic claims may, at first glance, seem quite distant from the Puritan past, Franklin maintains an ideological core with Puritan roots. Interestingly, the points that he rejects seem to involve the issues of human depravity and damning laws and divine decisions. In this way, Franklin rejects the less “pleasant” pieces of religious construction, while holding onto the ones he finds to be reasonably encouraging. From here, readers may ask how this picking and choosing is reflected in other parts of Franklin’s writings. In Wednesday’s class, the lack of emotional depth in the narrative surfaced as a discussion point. Could Franklin be picking and choosing uplifting pieces of both religion and himself to reinforce in his narrative? Perhaps his negative, or unruly, emotions are omitted for the same reason he omits such traditional church doctrine, as he says that it “appear’d to me unintelligible” (82). This is an interesting possibility for two reasons. Firstly, it suggests an unreliable character of Franklin because he is selectively choosing to disclose certain information in order to manipulate the audience’s perception; secondly, it suggests that Franklin’s religious/social beliefs are not so progressive. If they are  to be viewed as reflections of his self-serving habits in self-telling, then it is not grounded to sever him from the religious past from which he emerges. Rather, his deistic views may function in a way to strategically align himself with reason, because this is the rational character he seeks to construct. At the same time, however, he does not deny the significance of all religiosity, and since he is a self-proclaimed man of pride, perhaps this is an attempt at appearing to have virtue.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Comments Off on Franklin’s Deism … Distant Love of God, Close Love of Self

The 13 Virtues for Autobiography Writing, inspired by Benjamin Franklin

1. Temperance

Don’t talk about a subject or event until you wear out its interest. Don’t overuse words to the point of dulling their meaning.

2. Silence

Know when to withhold your opinions from the text; allow the reader at times to draw his or her own conclusion.

3. Order

Either tell your life story chronologically, or in some arrangement that makes the narrative more transparent, interesting, or profound.

4. Resolution

Achieve that goal which you set out to reach with your narrative; don’t allow your story to be commandeered or distracted by some other purpose or ambition.

5. Frugality

Waste not one page to indulge in anecdote telling for only your sake. Do not use two paragraphs of description when one will do, nothing is worse than pages and pages with no plot or action.

6. Industry

Do not take so much time to write your autobiography that you die before it is done and it has to be published unfinished.

7. Sincerity

If you relate a tale that shows another in an unflattering light, be committed to its truthfulness and integral purpose in your story.

8. Justice

Slander no one and only say those uncomfortable untruths about others that are necessary to make sense of your own life experience.

9. Moderation

Avoid polarizing readers with overzealous views on any topic; If you must express your convictions on an extreme idea make sure to show how you are able to consider other views.

10. Cleanliness

Use clean and clear language; do not muddle your words so that you obscure your meaning.

11. Tranquility

Show to your readers that you have gained some inner peace or likewise some transformation of the self by sharing your story with them.

12. Chastity

Abstain from that which would serve only to corrupt your story and invite unwelcome and undeserving criticism.

13. Humility

Benjamin Franklin had it right when he said “Imitate Jesus and Socrates” except for the fact that it probably isn’t a good idea to be wrongfully put to death by the government before you can enjoy the proceeds of selling your autobiography.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Comments Off on The 13 Virtues for Autobiography Writing, inspired by Benjamin Franklin

Like Father Like Son

Ben Franklin’s Autobiography is highly unique in that it was written in four parts, each occurring at very different parts of his life.  His original intention, shown in Part 1 of the autobiography, is to present his own life as an example to his son.  He does this in hopes that his actions will give his son a certain amount of guidance in how to live his own life.  Ironically, father and son are split in opinion due to the Revolutionaries and loyalty to the British Crown.  As such, their contact is severed, thus opening Franklin’s Autobiography to a much wider audience.  These new readers include the authors of the letters in Part 2–both, coincidentally, having already read Part 1 of Franklin’s text.  All of a sudden, Franklin’s utilitarian justification for his autobiography becomes something much larger and more detailed.  Modern critics often argue that Franklin’s Autobiography is full of blunders and arrogant intellect.  However, this is not a fair assumption regarding the text.

Franklin’s new, expounded audience must be taken into consideration.  Smith and Watson write that reading audiences are “heterogeneous collectives for whom certain discourses of identity, certain stories, certain truths make sense at various moments” (97).  How then, are we to fairly conclude that Franklin’s autobiography is any one thing?  Franklin utilizes humility and the occasional good witted humor to portray many of the challenges he meets in the business world.  But as readers, our interpretations are constantly changing.  As separate audiences, they are exponentially different.  Smith and Watson continue by saying that “because readers ‘consume’ narratives along with other stories from elite as well as popular culture, their responses to life writing are influenced by other kinds of stories in general circulation–in families, communities, regions, nations, diasporas” (98).  If culture is constantly changing, there is no solid foundation in which Franklin’s autobiography is to be compared or challenged.  True, the spiritual narratives of times past have some impact on the autobiography–especially in that Franklin seems to modernize the element of self-deprivation by exemplifying his own self-gratification through hard work.  But it is important for us, as an audience, to take a more timeless approach to our interpretation of the Autobiography.  For over a hundred years, Franklin’s audiences have varied from one status to another–but yet the book still remains on shelves in local bookstores.

This can be illustrated simply.  Smith and Watson argue that the change in audience is monitored closely by the appearance of the publication itself.  More specifically, “we can trace shifts in reading tastes by observing the modifications of content and presentation of the versions over time” (99).  Through the use of illustration, contextual readings, and other works supporting the publication, the audience’s perspective is constantly shifted according to its own schema.  It is doubtful that Franklin intended to have as large a reading audience as he does.  Possibly he once considered the work to be solely interpreted by his son, William.  Nevertheless, due to the four parts occurring in completely separate situations, his Autobiography remains a classic example of how narrative is able to shift in accordance with the culture and beliefs of its audience.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Like Father Like Son

Ethics: Franklin vs. The Puritans

In his autobiography, Benjamin Franklin expresses his concern for ethics and encourages his own learned set of values. This is most easily seen in his list of thirteen virtues which include temperance, silence, order, resolution, frugality, industry, sincerity, justice, moderation, cleanliness, tranquility, chastity, and humility. Through following these ethical guidelines Franklin believed that one may achieve moral perfection, though when noting his offenses realized that although impossible, the attempt itself was both honorable and meaningful. Through realizing Franklin’s high standards of virtue and the constricting self-control needed to achieve them, we may see many similarities between himself and the Puritans before him. Like the Puritans, Franklin expresses through his writing that strict moral self-awareness and control is crucial in becoming an honest and virtuous citizen. His list of thirteen virtues reflect the ethical guidelines set by the protestant Church and adhered to by the Puritans. However, through these thirteen virtues established by Benjamin Franklin we may also see the many differences between himself and the Puritan community. Unlike the Puritans who sought moral perfection in order to please their God and achieve a place in heaven, Franklin believed one must abide by a rule of ethics as a human being, not just as a Christian follower. He believed one should live by virtue in order to become a better person and a better citizen. He believed there should not only be justice in the afterlife, but on earth as well. One should be virtuous for themselves, not just for God. In his thirteenth virtue, Humility, Franklin advises to “imitate Jesus and Socrates” (Franklin 86). This simple statement places Jesus and Socrates on the same plane of morality, a sentiment the Puritans would certainly not appreciate. It suggests that one imitate Jesus’s life, as well as Socrates, but does not demand their devotion or religious following. Franklin sees Jesus as a moral inspiration and his life an example of virtue but does not claim, nor encourage, a commitment to religion and to Christianity. In this he is vastly different from the Puritans.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Comments Off on Ethics: Franklin vs. The Puritans